The Nissan & IBM Outsourcing Agreement

IntroductionChief Information Officer's (CIO's) would need to have
In the year, prior to the turn of the millennium, Nissancompleted extensive research and have done a
was a company in a serious financial crisis. Debt hadthorough analysis of their business processes.
approached $22 billion by 1999. The company hadThis is exactly what Nissan's CIO did, or rather what
been too complacent, and had taken its prior success,Ghosn told him to do. The company had invested over
for granted [2].80 billion yen (over $US760million) in 1998 on IT
Did Nissan's decision to outsource their IT Infrastructureservices, but their processes were still not providing the
to IBM in 1999 make good sense? Nissan was a verymanagement with the infrastructure that would assist
troubled auto-manufacturer in the late 1990's. Seniorin building their competitive edge [5]. The final decision
executives from the company were known for theirwas made to approach various outsourcing service
conservative outlook on business, and their 'old boy'sproviders for the much needed help.
network,' mentality. Profits were dropping dramatically,II. Does outsourcing the IT infrastructure make sense?
eventually forcing the company into the $22 Billion debtIf Information Technology (IT) truly was a commodity,
that it then faced. There were no signs indicating alike gasoline or electricity, then companies only
change in the market that would encourage profitcompeted on price, with very small profit margins. In
growth. The vehicle sales needed invigoration.that event, the decision to turn over IT to an
Mergers were the flavor of the day in the automotiveoutsourcer was as simple as it was a century ago to
industry during the late 1990's. Nissan executivesturn to motor vehicles instead of using the horse and
approached Daimler Chrysler and Ford to discuss acart. However, while personal computers and the
possible merger, but there was no interest from eithernetworks they run on may be standardized, the
of the companies [2]. There was only one alternativeservices provided by IT outsourcers vary in many
left, which was to reinvent themselves and reduceways. Services such as data analysis, application
unnecessary overheads. This was the defining pointdevelopment, and IT decision-making allowed
that led to the business process outsourcing decision.companies more competitiveness in the market
This paper seeks to answer the question "Does thetherefore, those elements of IT are far from being
cost of implementing an in-house solution outweigh theviewed as commodities [8].
benefits or does Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)With regards the decision to outsource, many factors
make more sense?" We reviewed the example of thewere considered in Nissan's case. Ann Moynihan in her
automotive manufacturer, Nissan, when they decidedarticle in the Albany Business review states
to outsource their entire Information Technology"Outsourcing can help you: [3]
department to IBM in late 1999, to answer our question.• Reduce and control operating costs.
Nissan - A brief history and the events leading up to• Free staff to focus on core business.
the BPO decision• Gain access to specialized skills and
I. The Boom yearstechnologies.
Nissan was established in Japan in 1933 as a heavy• Introduce positive change.
industry manufacturer. After the Second World War• Gain control over a difficult-to-manage function
they turned their attention to automotive vehicles. In theresulting from uneven workloads, insufficient or unskilled
1950's, they finally had an impact on the global marketresources."
with the introduction of the Datsun branded sedansWith Nissan, in 1999, this was exactly what they were
and small pickup trucks. The company eventuallylooking for. Refocused staff efforts, introduction of
opened full-time operations in the USA in Septemberpositive change and control gained in all critical areas
1960 [6].led to the outsourcing decision.
The company experienced dramatic growth with theThe choice of IBM as Nissan's outsourcing partner
introduction of the 'Z' series sports sedans in the earlywas a strategic one. In the late 1990's there were not
1970's, with the 240Z becoming the fastest sellingmany outsourcing companies that had the breadth or
sports car of all time. This success led Nissan to thethe global reach that IBM had. Competitors such as
top of the U.S. vehicle importers market by 1975.EDS and CSC were not considered because they
Vehicle sales in the USA topped over 250,000 unitswere only outsourcers and could not offer the
per annum by 1970 [6]. The company was young, itshardware and software technology that Nissan
leaders dynamic and the future looked very bright.required to update their infrastructure [5]. If either one
They were competing for the U.S. market with theof those competitors were selected over IBM as a
likes of Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors, showingpartner Nissan would still have faced the same
improved quality and production efficiencies over theirinfrastructure issues. IBM was the only logical partner.
competitors.Did the relationship work between Nissan & IBM?
The company was growing at a phenomenal rate,I. A further look at the relationship between IBM and
opening new manufacturing plants around the world onNissan
a regular basis such as Australia (1976), Spain (1980)In a joint IBM and Nissan press release published in
and the United Kingdom (1984) [6]. There was noTokyo on June 19, 2000, the two companies
respite to the pace of growth and new businessannounced that they were "Extending their global
generation coming from the company.partnership for information system (IS) operations
In 1983, the company began the worldwide marketingwhich Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and IBM agreed in
of vehicles under the Nissan name which was felt toOctober 1999, Nissan and IBM today jointly announced
have a stronger quality image and started the six yearthat Nissan will outsource its IS operations in Japan, to
transition from Datsun to Nissan on vehicles,IBM Japan.
dealerships, facilities and marketing materials. SalesThe service includes Nissan's regular maintenance and
continued to grow, eventually reaching 830,767 in 1985operational activities as well as part of its application
[6]. The decade closed out with resounding successdevelopment, but excludes the planning and design of
for Nissan with their domination of the North Americannew systems. The two companies will start operations
market.from October 1. [7]
In 1993, the mid-line Stanza sedan was replaced withIn North America, Nissan has outsourced these same
an all-new Altima and non-competitiveoperations to IBM Corp. since October 1999. This latest
Japanese-designed minivan was replaced with a newagreement in Japan is expected to further accelerate
U.S. created Quest, which was the first minivan withthe standardization, integration and centralization of
car-like handling. Sales came roaring back in 1994 toNissan's IS on a global level."
near-peak levels of 774,405 [6].Ghosn further noted, "The Nissan Revival Plan cannot
In 1996, sales began to slip once again, fueled by abe accomplished without effective information
change in American vehicle tastes. Trucks and SUVssystems. Following upon the recent agreement with
gained market share at the expense of sedans andJapan Telecom, this latest partnership with IBM puts in
sports cars [2]. Nissan's position as a manufacturingplace the global infrastructure which is key to support
driven company, which helped them in the '80's andNissan's long term profitable growth." [4]
early '90's, then had new problems with the dollar/yenII. Hypothetical view of the Return-on-Investment model
balance which began to hurt their competitivenessused
against market driven companies.Before they could calculate their Return on Investment
Unlike their competitors, Toyota and Honda, which(ROI), Nissan first had to look at the Total Cost of
were focused on key volume segments, Nissan didOwnership model proposed by IBM. Total Cost of
not dominate any individual segment and competed inOwnership (TCO) is a type of calculation designed to
identical segments against Toyota and Honda.help consumers and enterprise managers assess both
Unfortunately for Nissan in the 1990s, the Japanesedirect and indirect costs and benefits related to the
"bubble economy" burst, a downturn in Europepurchase of any IT component. The intention was to
coincided, so there was more pressure in the U.S. toarrive at a final figure that will reflect the effective cost
perform. Unfortunately U.S. customers didn't have aof purchase, overall [8].
genuine brand reason to shop Nissan except for theThe TCO model used, had to calculate the costs that
'best price' deal.were required, beyond the fees of outsourcing. The
Former Nissan president, Mr. Nakamura, announced aorganization had to evaluate specific criteria's that
"Back-to-Basics" plan. The key elements of the plancould have added expense to the outsourcing project.
were to reduce inventories, eliminate unrealistic salesThey also had to calculate the ongoing expenses
targets, and increase dealer profitability. Unfortunatelythroughout the lifetime of the contract [8].
for Nakamura and Nissan, the plan did not work [2].Then, after calculating the payback period, Nissan
II. Trouble looms for the auto-manufacturer in 1990'swere in a position to calculate their ROI. Once the
In the early 1990's, trouble began to brew in thenumbers were crunched, a thorough financial and risk
organization. The once revered executives at Nissananalysis was conducted. The ROI measured the profit
were now viewed as arrogant members of theor cost savings realized. It was calculated by
old-boys club and were ignorant to the changing needsestimating, for a 3-year period, the investment was
of their customers and the overall automotive market,made and the resulting profit created through that
in general.investment.
As the company progressed deeper into debt, it metThe results were conclusive. Nissan and IBM entered
with more challenges. Nissan's business partners andinto their agreement and operations scheduled to
suppliers were charging a premium for their goods andcommence on October 1, 1999.
services. Nissan was obliged to meet its financialConclusion
commitments and by so doing placed itself further intoI. Did Nissan's BPO reach its stated objective?
debt. Finally, the company was in debt to the tune ofNissan's stated objective for the outsourcing of the IT
$22 billion. Even the company's financers wereinfrastructure was to control expenditure, improve
tightening the noose around them. Nissan felt theefficiencies, and update the infrastructure. By
situation was hopeless.outsourcing to IBM, Nissan achieved all of its goals.
III. Steps taken to address issuesIn controlling expenditure, outsourcing gave companies
Nissan executives were looking for a way out, a waythe opportunity to have a predictable monthly budget
to rescue the company from entering into bankruptcy.for expenditure. That amount may or may not have
The first approach was to find a partner. Both thebeen lower than current expenditures but the
newly established DaimlerChrysler and the Ford Motorcomponent that was crucial to a large organization
company were approached, but both organizationssuch as Nissan was that the amount is predictable.
rejected the idea of a merger [2]. Finally, Renault, theThere was no variable component to the pricing. The
French automotive company recovering from a similaronly time the pricing may have fluctuated was when
predicament, decided to enter into negotiations with theadditional services, which were out of scope of the
flailing Japanese company. A senior executive atcontract, were required.
Renault, Carlos Ghosn, was a huge supporter of theIn Nissan's case, that was never a requirement. The
merger idea.company was in the first stage of a major, global,
After much negotiation, the Japanese Ministry ofrestructuring project and there were no new initiatives
Economy, Trade and Industry agreed to allow Renaulttaking place.
to purchase a substantial stake in Nissan. TheThe second objective in the BPO was to improve
Nissan-Renault alliance was born and Ghosn wasefficiencies. IBM is the world's largest information
appointed Chief Operating Officer.technology company with revenues close to $100
Nissans Executive decisions and major eventsbillion [9]. When companies outsource their operations
I. Creating a global alliance vision:to IBM they are gaining best-of-breed technologies,
The following is excerpted from the Nissan/Renaultexcellent consultants and some of the best systems
alliance vision:architects money can buy.
"The Renault-Nissan Alliance is a unique group of twoThe way that any global outsourcer makes its money
global companies linked by cross-shareholding. Theyis by achieving economies of scale. The only way to
are united for performance though a coherentachieve these economies of scale is to ensure that
strategy, common goals, and principles, results-driventhey deploy the best hardware, software, and
synergies, shared best practices. They respect andinfrastructure possible and make that equipment work
reinforce their respective identities and brands."[2]to maximum efficiencies. By taking full advantage of
The Alliance set itself three objectives, with the goal ofthis best-of-breed technology, Nissan met its second
being amongst the best three automotive groups in theand third stated objectives.
following areas:II. What if the IT Infrastructure had been retained
1. Quality.in-house?
Achieve customer recognition as being a quality andIf Nissan had decided to retain its IT infrastructure
value added product.in-house and attempted to implement an updated and
2. Technology.modernized system, it would have lead to a significant
Lead in key technology development andincrease in their expenditure. Ghosn's prime objective,
implementation with a focus on excellence in specificwhen he took over the company in 1999, was to
areas of the automotive business.reduce expenditure by 700 billion Yen [2]. He was not
3. Operating Profit.interested in spending any additional money to
Consistently generate a high operating profit marginmodernize existing equipment.
and vigorously pursue growth.To support the intended improvement in
II. Appointing a new leadercompetitiveness, Nissan had to ensure that their
Ghosn, given his enthusiasm for the merger, hisinfrastructure supported the additional workload. There
demonstrated tenacity, and his experience of thewas no way they could do the intended improvement
automotive industry, was a natural choice for a seniorin efficiencies without external support. Nissan did not
position at Nissan. His initial appointment as Chiefhave the expertise and the additional work force to
Operating Officer (COO) was just a temporaryhandle the required upgrades and the reengineering of
assignment. In 2000, he was named President and inbusiness processes.
2001, he was appointed Chief Executive OfficerIII. Final assessment and summation of the relationship
(CEO).Robert Greenberg, Nissan's CIO of North America
As CEO, Ghosn was very aware that the 'buck'was on record as saying in 2006 that, "We were
stopped with him. He was the final decision maker.happy with the services from IBM but the world had
Some important and very serious decisions werechanged." This comment sums up the relationship as it
made to save the ailing company. Ghosn had to use allstands now, almost 8 years later [5]. When Nissan
of his valuable experience gained from rescuing otherannounced its Revival Plan, in 1999, the company had
organizations, such as Michelin and Renault, to savevery clear objectives; cut costs, and return to
Nissan.profitability.
III. Decision making to save a troubledNissan was looking for help in 1999 and IBM fulfilled this
auto-manufacturerrole for their IT Infrastructure. Greenberg also stated in
With Ghosn's arrival in Japan in the spring of 1999, hehis Q&A that "One of the things that also took
immediately set about researching Nissan's rootplace with the original outsourcing to IBM was we
problems. The newly appointed COO had aprobably outsourced too much." [5]
management philosophy that stated "you must alwaysGreenberg was not working for Nissan when the
start with a clean sheet of paper because the worstoriginal outsourcing decision was made in 1999; he only
thing you can have is prefabricated solutions... youjoined the company in 2005. He is on record though as
have to start with a zero base of thinking, cleaningsaying that he thought that they should have either
everything out of your mind."[2]retained some of the infrastructure in-house or
For the first few months, Ghosn flew around Japan,perhaps have multi-sourced, thereby ensuring that they
meeting and greeting employees at all levels, absorbinghad the best possible solution and price.
information and formulating a plan. He used thisIn 2006, when the contract came up for renewal, the
information to plot a picture of Nissan from a globalCIO decided to put everything out to bid and compare
perspective, identifying issues, and problems that hadwhat the other vendors were offering with what IBM
created the dispersed, unprofitable organization.had provided for so many years. The decision to look
One of the many issues Ghosn identified was the lackat new vendors was actually excellent timing for the
of communication around the organization. Seniorscompany as Nissan had decided to relocate their
managers around the world were aware of some ofNorth American corporate headquarters from Los
the issues that caused the downturn of fortune in theAngeles, CA to Nashville, TN and any transition could
company. They even had solutions to them, but hadbe timed to coincide with the move.
lacked the necessary authority to implement orUltimately, what Greenberg opted to do was to accept
communicate the solutions back to CorporateIBM's proposal to "manage desktop systems, network
Headquarters.services, help desks, dealer systems, and other key
Finally, the major issues were whittled down to fiveinfrastructure elements for Nissan North America." He
key issues: [2]then outsourced the application and maintenance to an
• Lack of clear profit orientation. Nissan was notIndian firm, Satyam and brought the remainder of the
focused on driving profit, but were rather focused onservices back in-house [5].
market share and ended up having to buy their marketWhen asked about the decision to bring IT back
share at the expense of the declining profits.in-house, Greenberg said, "By bringing it in-house you
• Insufficiently focused on customers and tooincrease the alignment. It's a matter of building the
much focus on competitors. The company was tooknowledge internally [that] can be used to help drive
concerned about the competition introducing a new linethe business activity, which is much harder when a
which would have dug into the Nissan market share.business analyst function is sitting within a third party."
For example when Volkswagen introduced their new[5]
Jetta sedan Nissan saw a significant decline in theirIV. Does the cost of implementing an in-house solution
Maxima sales.outweigh the benefits or does BPO make more
• Lacked cross-functional, cross-border, andsense?
intra-hierarchical lines of work in the company. NissanAs Stephen Withers stated in his article, BPO decisions
seemed to operate as separate islands scatteredshould not be made for cost-cutting exercises but
throughout the globe. There was no centralizedrather for strategic directions [1]. In other words,
purchasing function or in fact any of the other majorcompanies should not view BPO as a cost saving tool.
business activities. The organization was not makingOutsourcing the IT operation makes sense when an
maximum use of its global presence or buying power.organization is looking to improve efficiencies and
• Lack of sense of urgency. The executives inbusiness processes or when they cannot attract, or
Nissan were complacent in their activities. Things hadretain, the human capital who have the expertise and
gone so well for the company in the preceding 60ability to modernize or improve the infrastructure.
years that they felt that there was no reason toNissan's CIO Robert Greenberg thought that he would
embrace change.actually save money by bringing some of the work
• No shared vision or common long-term plan.back in-house because he was "not paying margin on
Senior management within Nissan did not have a jointthe individual [headcount]." [5]
plan for the different brands within the company. EachSome of the individual lessons that Nissan's Greenberg
division did their own thing with little or no thought forhas learnt from the outsourcing agreement with IBM
the greater good of the company. An example washas been that certain services developed by the IT
the Z series that had achieved phenomenal successorganization can indeed be outsourced or developed
throughout the 1970's and '80's but was suddenlyexternally. However, he felt strongly about retaining
dropped from production when sales dropped. Thein-house IT skills in such value generation areas as
obvious thing to have been done was to test thebusiness analysts who have a strong understanding of
market with a modernized design. Instead Nissanthe business, sometimes even better than the business
chose to ignore the market and drop the brand.customer does. Insourcing these skills could result in
To address the issues, Ghosn announced the Nissanideas and dialog with the business, with the end result
Revival Plan on October 18, 1999. This seven-point planbeing a service delivery or product development than
was aimed at reducing costs and debt as well ascan then be outsourced.
creating and launching new automotive brands to raiseIn summary, the answer to the question, 'Does the
sales and market awareness. The goals announced incost of implementing an in-house solution outweigh the
the plan were far-reaching and encompassed: [2]benefits or does Business Process Outsourcing make
• The reduction of operating costs, net debt,more sense?' is that it depends. It depends on the
global head count, and vehicle assembly plants andavailable skills; it depends on the overall objectives
manufacturing platforms (the latter in Japan).(cost saving vs. process improvement) and it depends
• The generation of new product investmenton the organization. For the most part the majority of
through the launch of twenty-two new models.major corporations world wide that have been through
The cost-cutting plan called for centralization ofan outsourcing contract or are in an outsourcing
purchasing, procurement, human resources andcontract will agree that there are substantial benefits
information technology. By centralizing these essentialto implementing an outsourcing contract and there
functions, the plan aimed to assist the company insubstantial benefits in retaining those skills in-house.
achieving its aggressive cost reductions.What each organization needs to do is ascertain
Expenditure, particularly in the information technologywhich of those benefits outweigh the other and base
function, was perceived as being out of control.their decision on that analysis.
Ghosn's message to senior level executives wasWorks Cited
clear, "cut costs in every possible area." If that meant[1] Withers, Stephen. "BPO: Save money or fix your
outsourcing non-core activities because somebodyprocesses?" [ 17 August 2004. Downloaded October
else could do it cheaper, then that had to be fully22, 2007
investigated and determined. The management was[2] Magee, David. Turn Around: How Carlos Ghosn
ruthless in their execution of the plan [2].rescued Nissan. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc,
Nissan looks at Business Process Outsourcing as a2003.
means[3] Moynihan, Ann. "Outsourcing enables owner to
I. Will outsourcing non-core activities save money?focus on core business." October 11, 2002.
There are well-documented records of company'sDownloaded October 22, 2007
saving money and others of outsourcing horror stories.[4] IBM Press room press releases. "Extending Their
Success really depended on the situation and theGlobal Partnership, Nissan, and IBM Announce IS
provider.Outsourcing for Japan" June 19, 2000. Downloaded
Most experts agreed, though, that you needed to useOctober 19, 2007
BPO in strategic decisions, for example refocused[5] Thibodeau, Patrick. "Q&A: Nissan CIO reshapes
efforts on core competencies and not merely for costautomaker's IT" March 29, 2006. Downloaded October
cutting activities [1]. Stephen Withers of ZDNet said in23, 2007
his on-line article that you should only "use BPO for[7] McDougall, Paul. "IBM, Nissan Outsourcing Deal
strategic purposes, not to take advantage of aSpans The Globe" March 10, 2006 10:00 AM.
(possibly transient) cost saving." Withers then askedDownloaded November 02, 2007
the reader, "Does outsourcing the IT Infrastructure[8] Ikin, Paul. IBM Representative on Nissan Global team.
make sense?" To answer that question corporate1998 to 2001.