Q&A - Andrew Kemp, BT - The BT Outsourcing Philosophy, and Aspirational SLAs

Almost exactly a year ago, BT - the largestnow about our finance function being a business
communications services provider in the UK and onepartner for change delivering great business
of the largest in the world - signed a six-year,performance, so you don't see words like "control" or
£128-million ($250-million) extension to an existing"reporting" in that mission statement or vision
outsourcing contract with tech outsourcing providerstatement.
Xansa (now part of the France-based Steria Group).To execute against that we think about our finance
The latter is now contracted to manage BT's UKfunction in three areas. One is transaction processing.
F&A, transaction processing, ledger and payrollThe second was the creation of Centers of
operations until 2014. We spoke with Andrew Kemp,Excellence, which bring together finance systems; bring
BT's Director of Group Planning & Analysis, abouttogether reporting, planning and analysis capability; and
the nature of the second-generation agreement, itsbring together some of the regulatory reporting
challenges and benefits, and about the innovativecapability. And then at the top of the pyramid if you
"aspirational SLAs" which are part of the deal andlike, we believe in a concept called "business insights"
which are driving forward improvements for bothwhere we think about people in the finance function
buyer and provider.working very closely with the business on support,
Q: Andrew, thanks very much for joining us. First let'ssupplier renegotiation, market, product, competitor
get some background: what does your role entail?analysis - that kind of thing. We felt we could get more
A: I'm responsible for all the group's reporting, planningvalue from our finance function that way, but we didn't
and consolidation activities, serving all the businesseswant to add cost - quite the opposite. So as part of
within BT. I'm also responsible for all our financethat overall strategy we've outsourced all of our
outsourcing deals and also for the group's financetransaction processing across the group and where
systems strategy.appropriate in the Centers of Excellence we've begun
Q: And are all these activities located in a sharedto outsource some of that as well.
service center?Q: It sounds like a lot of the things you've included in
A: Using both Steria and Accenture we have delivery"business insights" would fit into the Centers of
centres in Chennai, primarily; some in Prague; but I'veExcellence, no?
also got what we call a Center of Excellence for theA: Not really, no! The Centers of Excellence house
reporting, planning and analysis function in the UK whichactivities and areas of commonality that serve the
is based in and around centers around London - not inwhole business. Things around the month-end close,
any one single building.standard ways of reporting, standard ways of running
Q: What operations do you have running out of thea budget or a forecast process: they can all come into
UK?a Center of Excellence. The analysis around the way
A: Roles that are fairly close to the customer, a highwe would deal with our consumer business in the UK
level of interaction with customers' finance andand think about that in terms of the price plans, BT
analysis functions, and quite a lot of planning, togetherTogether etc, is fundamentally different from the
with group consolidation which we don't outsource.analysis and support needed when you're running a
Most of the transactional stuff is done abroad.global services networked IT services business.
Q: How much interaction is there between BT'sQ: So what's next? Where next with the Steria
operations over here and the Chennai centers?relationship and with BT's outsourcing philosophy?
A: For me it's been pretty seamless, and the transitionsA: Well, we're one year into the next six-year period of
have been pretty seamless; we have our single pointsthe second-generation deal, so over the next year or
of contact for various processes. We tend to focusso Steria and ourselves will work to get to the 80-20
on the output rather than how they do it.offshore-onshore ratios. We are constantly looking at
Q: Tell us about the latest deal you've done with Steria.and refining scope; there're some interesting interplays
A: It's a second-generation deal building on the previousbetween what Steria does and what BT does around
five to six years' work we've done with them. Fivetheir involvement in procurement and procure-to-pay,
years ago we did a TUPE [Transfer of Undertakingsand payroll, and those interfaces: there's plenty to
(Protection of Employment): UK regulations preservingexplore there. We have in the current deal created the
"employees' terms and conditions when a business orconcept of aspirational SLAs, so we have a vision of
undertaking, or part of one, is transferred to a newtrying to drive the service towards world-class by
employer"] transfer outsource to them, so it was stillsetting and then working together to deliver against
UK-centered. The second-generation deal will moveaspirational SLAs, and we'll see where it takes us in a
the onshore-offshore ratio from about 50-50 to 80%couple of years.
offshore on average within the next twelve months orQ: How do you define "aspirational SLAs"? The SLAs
so. We've strengthened the SLAs and performancemost of us are familiar with are very set-in-stone
from our perspective, and have really built on thetargets against which a service is measured and
strong relationship we've had with Steria over the pastassessed...
five years.A: Yes, and by their very nature they're not aspirational
Q: What operations were part of the original- because you would never commit in a contract to it
outsourcing deal?with the penalties likely to be incurred.
A: Our UK transaction processing; this is what's nowQ: So how have you arranged things?
getting moved out to Chennai. Accenture do ourA: We have two tiers. Firstly we have the SLAs
non-UK transaction processing.which you've just described, and then we have a set
Q: What was it about Steria that attracted you initiallyof aspirational SLAs which we recognised when we
five years ago?set them would probably need a level of investment
A: Primarily two things. One was that they werefrom both parties. They are the things which are part
prepared to take the employees on a TUPE basis,of our governance conversations about how we can
guaranteeing the rights of those individuals. Secondly,take the relationship forward to deliver a truly
and linked, they had a much stronger commitment toworld-class service.
people, and people development, and culturally wereQ: Planning for future added value from the
much more aligned with the way BT was back then.agreement?
Q: What have been the biggest obstacles, and theA: Yes, exactly.
biggest benefits, that you've encountered through theQ: That's quite unusual, but sounds dynamic. Was this
deal?something you developed yourself?
A: In terms of obstacles both our organisations overA: It's something we were reflecting on. One of the
the last five years have had to work with the legacythings I've been thinking about as I've been working
of dealing with people and behavioural issueswith the outsourcing world for three or four years now
associated with the original outsource. As we'reis that there's a tremendous focus on SLAs: you get
moving work offshore that's obviously been ato your quarterly governance meetings and
challenge. We also have had to work through andeverything's green and there's no sense of challenge
around the fact that these were ex-BT employeesor pushback or aspiration or ambition, because
and they had long-standing relationships with friendseverything is seen to be working ok. For me that
and colleagues who were at that point still employedwasn't desperately satisfying. So we were really keen
by BT, so getting governance to work was ato find a way of striving to improve what we do, and
challenge because there were people just going roundthis is the methodology we've come up with.
the edges and finding their colleagues: that wasn'tQ: And it's working well for you?
easy. I think the benefits have been significant,A: We're one year in and most of the focus is still on
economically, but just as importantly we get muchthe onshore-offshore ratios, but I've got a couple of
better transparency around what we're doing now; Iexamples where I'm really quite encouraged actually.
think the controls are stronger; and I think the processThe way we interact - both BT and Steria - with our
improvement that we're getting - particularly now oversuppliers is too old-fashioned; there's too much paper
the last couple of years or so - is very good indeed.and pen, you know? And now we're really pushing
Q: Andrew, moving onto a broader perspective let'selectronic invoicing, together, and I think that will deliver
talk a little about BT's sourcing philosophy: it seems thata much better supplier experience - and I think it will
what you can, you are...take overall costs out for both companies and improve
A: Yes. For us in finance our outsourcing strategy wasthe overall level of efficiency of the service. So that
a function primarily of where we wanted to go withwould be an example where we've gone from below
our finance function. We had a finance function a few50% electronic invoicing and I'm pretty confident that
years ago that was typically focused on reporting,during 2009 we'll be north of 80%, and we'll take stock
keeping score. We knew we were trusted andat that point and work out what that means and if it's
respected as a function but we also knew that theworth taking further.
business wanted more from us, more value. We think