Obstacles to Success of Offshore Outsourcing Endeavors

IntroductionAlso ensuring continuous knowledge transfer to the
Many well intentioned offshore projects get off to avendor’s employees working on your project,
flying start, but fail to succeed over the long term ormake feel as a part of your extended organization
worse still are abandoned mid-way, even though aand perform better.
considerable time & effort is spent by companiesFailure in bridging the Cultural Gap
before and during the initial stages of an offshoreMost of the offshore workers will not have an
engagement on activities like documenting the projectexposure to the Western way of life and to the
RFP, evaluating and shortlisting service providers,Western work culture. Therefore besides the training
defining quality parameters, training the offshore team,related directly to work, your in-house staff may need
and the like. This article looks at some factors thatto spend time in acquainting the vendor’s
may impede the success of the offshore outsourcingemployees with the cultural nuances of the
endeavor with suggestions to avoid or overcomeorganization and that of the your company’s home
them.base, be it Europe or US. For example although English
Unrealistic assumptions on cost savingsis an official language in India, pronunciation and accents
The first and major obstacle to success is thecan vary tremendously. Though many service
unrealistic assumptions on the savings. Organizationsproviders put their employees through accent &
assume savings will happen right from the day thelanguage training and have cultural education programs,
delivery starts happing from the offshore location. inherent differences due to culture, religion, social
The initial costs involved in the offshoring (oftenactivities, way of dressing, and even the way a junior
referred to as the soft costs or hidden costs) that areinteracts with a senior colleague will not be easy to
over and above the direct cost of the contract, oftenovercome. Something that’s common sense to the
bring down the resultant savings drastically in the firstWestern worker may be a completely foreign
six months to a year. These costs arise due to timeconcept to an overseas worker.
spent in pre-offshoring activities like processSimilarly your senior management & your in-house
documentation, vendor evaluation & selection,staff directly involved in the transition process need to
overseas travel both to the vendor location and ofacquaint themselves with the culture of the country
their pilot project team to your offices, and upfrontwhere the vendor is located to communicate
investment in equipment & other hardware toeffectively with them and be able to understand the
facilitate data communication between your office(s)soft aspects of doing business with them. This avoids
and the vendor’s offshore location(s) before theissues that can arise due to misunderstanding the
process transition can begin.‘language’ at either side. Mutual visits to the
Also many companies that outsource work offshoreother country are very helpful for effective working
wrongly assume that labor arbitrage will yield savingsrelationships as they help in drastic improvement of
on a person-to-person basis (i.e., Since a full-timeeach others understanding and in the quality of work.
equivalent employee in India cost 40% less, the savingsSome companies may try to save the travel cost by
will be in the same range!) without factoring in thecommunicating over the phone or using video
difference in productivity of and offshore worker v/sconferences, but in the long run this proves to be more
that of an inhouse employee; and the differences inexpensive because of the delay related to transitioning
operating model of the offshore vendor. Hank Zupnik,the process overseas and the longer time taken to
CIO of GE Real Estate, who has overseen numerousget the expected quality or performance from the
projects outsourced offshore for over a decade,offshore team.
rightly observed that one offshore worker couldn’tDisaffection of in-house staff
simply replace all the work done by one AmericanExtensive knowledge transfer and training are required
worker.prior to and during the transition of work to the vendor,
In reality, most organizations save 15-25% during theand this needs to be consistently supported by the
first year; by the third year, cost savings often reachin-house staff. However layoffs can cause major
35-40% as both the sides move up the learning-curvemorale problems among the in-house "survivors,"
and the client modifies their internal operations to alignleading to disaffection and work slowdowns. Internal
to an offshore model. Its is important to set realisticpeople may refuse to transition to the offshore model
targets and timelines for cost savings at the start tobecause they have a certain comfort level, or they
avoid a mid-course ‘blame-game’ both internallydon't want their co-worker to lose his job. Some of
and with the service provider.your staff may also start proclaiming, that offshore
Lack of well documented in-house processesoutsourcing is not saving money to the company after
Documentation is a time intensive and often neglegtedall and that it was a bad idea, which futher lowers
activity. It is observed that most internal processes aremorale of other employees. Sometimes your in-house
only about 30% documented, while one of theproject management team may need to work into the
prerequisite before offshoring a process is that thenight and arrive at work in the early morning to
documentation level should be at around 90%. Themanage the offshore team, and their perception about
documentation activity should include mapping thewho is benefiting and who is hurting becomes personal.
current process, putting down the transition strategy,You have to set aside management and employee
evaluation of all risks of failure and drawing up atime before, during and after the offshore transition to
contingency plan. Once the documentation istalk to your employees about the whole proposition of
completed, the company may change its outsourcingoffshoring and how it will help the company to become
strategy (e.g., from a single vendor to multiple vendors);more competitive in the long term. A consensus needs
or it might actually give a greater thrust to offshoring ifto be built among all employees favoring the
the vendor(s) seem better equipped to reduce riskscompany’s offshoring efforts. Without this kind of a
while keeping the costs low; or the company might bemandate, offshore endeavors are doomed.
deterred from outsourcing offshore due to the high riskBacklash from customers as a result of poor quality
involved if the endeavor fails. Though the results of riskcontrol
analysis vary between companies, documenting theThe cost savings resulting from offshoring is the
risks & preparing the contingency plan areprimary motivation for businesses to engage in the
important and a lack thereof may lead to mid-waysame. It is often realized late in the process that quality
abandonment of the offshoring project.is an important factor for a successful offshore
Poor expectation  managementengagement. Poor quality of service delivery will have
Outsourcing engagements have a supplier (vendor)a negative impact on the performance and the
and a recipient (client), and both will have differentreputation of the company may suffer in the eyes of
expectations from the relationship. That the service istheir customers.  A lack of adherence to the quality
delivered from offshore complicates it further, andnorms by the vendor and lack of monitoring of their
expectations mismatch become problematic.output can result in considerable rework, and
An expectation gap may arise when you are in doubtassociated follow-up costs.
about the vendor’s capability and hesitant toKPIs (Key Performance Indicators) of the offshore
offshore anything beyond a specific task, while theengagement should be defined in the beginning itself, so
service provider expects greater chunk of “higherthat the performance can be measured objectively
value” work and might feel unchallenged by dealingduring the tenure project and mid-course corrections
only with standard, unchallenging tasks. If thisare done wherever needed. It is also advisable to
expectation gap continues, the vendor may over time,institutionalize regular satisfaction surveys that
accord low importance to your project or may evenmeasure the “perception” of the engagement
want to get out of the relationship as soon as a higheracross several stakeholder levels.
value-add work comes their way.Conclusion
Similarly, you may expect the vendor employees toOffshore outsourcing is a phenomenon that’s here
come up to a level of understanding that matches thatto stay. Companies that are adopting this are learning
of your in-house staff, but they may not be able tooperate in a global business environment, and will
think or perform beyond the task that has beenbenefit in the long run as they gain insights into other
outsourced, and may ask questions that may seemcountries and their way of conducting business.
‘silly’, resulting in frustration at your end andHowever a failed or abandoned offshore outsourcing
possibly an early termination of the contract.venture may set back the company by both the
You should chart out a growth plan for the outsourcingmoney spent and the willingness to take up such
relationship so that the service provider have theiropportunities in the future. It is therefore important to
eyes set on the next target in terms of newstudy and analyze all factors that will affect the
processes coming their way. Knowing this growthoffshore endeavor and ensure that steps are taken to
path, the vendor and their employees will try to gainovercome the pitfalls well ahead of the offshore
deeper insights into your business, thus resulting intransition.
superior results during the initial ‘unchallenging’References
stages of offshoring too, and a stronger sense ofDean Davison; Top 10 Risks Of Offshore Outsourcing;
loyalty to their relationship with you.8.